Generation Z, true digital natives, have been immersed in various forms of digital media from a very young age. This constant exposure often leads to a sense of inner loneliness, as they turn to the internet in search of emotional warmth. The online realm, however, is dominated by fragmented information which provides only superficial comfort. Fragmentation simplifies complex events without encouraging deep thinking, leading to cognitive overload. As a result, Generation Z may experience fatigue from excessive surface-level information, which traps their logical systems and thinking abilities within an information cocoon. This cycle can cause anxiety, concentration difficulties, and a loss of interest in activities, impacting their overall mental well-being. As the pivotal group of contemporary times, it is crucial for Generation Z to critically assess the advantages and disadvantages of their digital engagements. They must be vigilant about the adverse effects of dispersed information and avoid numbing themselves with transient pleasures. By establishing a correct understanding of media consumption, Generation Z can evolve into more rational and mature media users, enhancing their capacity to handle the complexities of the digital age effectively.

Generation Y faces a unique set of pressures and anxieties stemming from various societal shifts including family planning policies, rapid economic growth, and transformative societal changes. Now in middle age, these individuals often find the limited labor force within their families a source of considerable stress, heightening their anxiety as they balance personal aspirations with familial responsibilities. Situated between the traditionally minded Generation X and the progressively inclined Generation Z, Generation Y navigates a complex landscape of expectations. While Generation X values traditional notions of success and stability, Generation Z is driven by innovation and peer competition, continually pushing the boundaries of personal independence. For Generation Y, making decisions often involves juggling the conservative values of their predecessors with the progressive ideas of the younger generation. This dynamic can lead them to suppress their own views in favor of family harmony or societal acceptance, akin to a complex Rubik’s Cube being manipulated by external forces. The need to consider and often prioritize the expectations of others can lead to a sense of oppression and unfulfilled personal potential.

Empathy, the capacity to experience and understand the emotions of others while distinguishing oneself from them, serves both as a personality trait and a complex psychological process. This process involves both a bottom-up mechanism of emotional sharing and a top-down cognitive regulation. The fundamental difference between Generation X and Generation Z lies in their distinct approaches to perceiving and processing emotions. Despite existing in similar environments and maintaining ostensibly close relationships, there is an intangible gap that often results in a profound division between these two cohorts. Generation X tends to be more pragmatic, focusing primarily on cognitive empathy. They engage in reasoning and judgment about emotional states, which often leads to a more analytical approach to understanding feelings. In contrast, Generation Z is more inclined towards affective empathy, prioritizing the feeling and experiencing of others' emotional states and responding empathetically. Consequently, when confronted with identical situations, these two generations exhibit differing emotional perceptions and perspectives, leading to varied responses and interpretations.